Independent Australian researchEvery figure sourced and datedMethodology →
DatedFacility data read off operator pages on 7 September 2026 · — facilities, — operatorsHow we verify →
AI Economy IndexAustralia

Home › Data centres

Infrastructure · verified 7 September 2026

Six in every seven megawatts
will never be built.

Australia has 44 gigawatts of data centre connection requests sitting with its grid operators. About 2.8 gigawatts of that will ever actually draw power. Everything else on this page follows from that gap, and almost nobody reports it.

Below: every facility we can verify, what it draws, who runs it, whether it is certified for Australian government data, and where the published numbers cannot be compared with each other.

The gap

Requested, likely, real.

44 GW
of connection requests lodged across the National Electricity Market
Requested
7.9 GW
judged likely to actually proceed to a connection
Likely
2.8 GW
expected real electrical draw at maturity
Real

Oxford Economics Australia, commissioned by AWS, published through the Data Centres Association of Australia, 21 November 2025. Source. Developers lodge requests at several sites for one project and let the unwanted ones lapse. The requests are real. Most of the megawatts are not.

What it looks like inside one state. AusNet in Victoria has taken about 8 GW of enquiries. 1.3 GW is contracted and connected. Just 340 MW is actually drawing power. Connected and consuming are not the same thing, and only one of them turns up in a bill.
And in another. Powerlink Queensland included zero data centre projects in its Queensland demand forecast. Not a small number. Zero. If you are reading a Queensland pipeline figure, it is coming from somewhere other than the transmission planner.
Electricity

AEMO moved the goalposts fourteen years in one release.

In the 2025 planning assumptions, data centres reached 34 TWh, roughly 12% of the grid, in 2050. In the 2026 Electricity Statement of Opportunities published on 25 August 2026, the same 34 TWh lands in 2035-36. The current share was restated from about 2% to about 3% at the same time.

AEMO 2026 ESOO, 25 August 2026. Built from 225 known projects, with heavy attrition applied: only about 36% of developing projects were assumed to complete, and grid connection utilisation averaged about 27% in FY26. AEMO also notes more than 40% of data centre projects since 2025 have dropped out or gone backwards in connection status. The raw 67 GW development pipeline is meaningless without those two qualifiers, which is why we do not print it as a headline.

Where they are

100 facilities, 29 operators, and no national total.

We will not add these up, and neither should anyone else. Thirty-eight facilities publish IT load, four publish a grid connection figure, twenty-four publish a number without saying what it measures, and thirty-four publish nothing at all. A campus total and its own building totals appear in the same dataset. Summing them produces a number that is simply wrong, which is how most published Australian pipeline figures are built.

Every facility

The list.

Read off each operator's own locations page on the date shown, or the specific announcement where noted. Where an operator publishes no capacity, the field is blank. Blank is not zero and it is not an estimate.

—
FacilityOperatorWhereStage CapacityNetworkResidencyServicesSource

Confidence is HIGH where the figure is on the operator's own page, MEDIUM where it comes from a company announcement or a network document, LOW where the only source is a media report. Hover or tap a facility name to see the trap, where there is one.

Money

What the build costs, where anyone says.

Seventeen projects publish a capital figure. Nobody publishes rack pricing, power charges or cross-connect fees, because colocation is quoted per deal and the operators treat pricing as commercial in confidence. We do not have those numbers and we are not going to guess at them.

Announced capital cost, in Australian dollars, as stated by the developer or in the project approval. These are build costs, not operating costs, and not what a customer pays.

The world

How Australia actually compares.

Australia is a serious but mid-sized market. One American metro area is about three times the size of the entire country.

MeasureFigurePeriodSource
Global data centre electricity485 TWh2025IEA, Key Questions on Energy and AI, 16 Apr 2026
Global share of all electricity~1.5%2025IEA, same report
Global projection950 TWh2030IEA base case, about 3% of world electricity
Australia, actual~5 TWh, ~3%FY2026AEMO 2026 ESOO, 25 Aug 2026
Australia, projection~34 TWh, ~13%FY2035-36AEMO 2026 ESOO, Step Change
Ireland23%2025CSO Ireland, 7 Jul 2026, of metered consumption
United States4.4%2023Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for US DOE
Global installed capacity103 GW2025JLL, 2026 Global Data Center Outlook
Global projection200 GW2030JLL, same report
Northern Virginia, one metro4,182 MWQ1 2026CBRE, Global Data Center Trends 2026
Australia, live capacity1.3 to 1.4 GW2025CBRE Australia, Why Australia for Data Centres
Australia, world ranking5th2024CBRE Australia, by built-out capacity
Two things a careful reader should know. CBRE's October 2024 release puts Australia fifth globally at about 1,500 MW. CBRE's own August 2025 material puts live capacity at 1.3 to 1.4 GW. A later report with a lower number. That is almost certainly built-out versus live rather than a decline, but CBRE does not reconcile the two, so we show both and label them. Separately, the widely repeated claim that Australia holds 2 to 3% of global capacity traces back to trade press, and in the original it refers to Australia's projected share of new demand to 2028, not its share of the installed base. We do not publish it.

Ireland's 23% is measured against metered consumption rather than total national generation, so headlines saying "23% of Ireland's electricity" slightly overstate it. The US figure is measured 2023 data and is now nearly three years old. LBNL's own 2028 projection is a range of 6.7% to 12%, which is too wide to reduce to a single number. Singapore is often quoted at around 7%. The last figure we could verify from a Singaporean government source is 7% in 2020, and a moratorium ran from 2019 to 2022, so we do not publish a current share.

How this list is built

Four rules, held.

A customer contract is not a site capacity. CDC announced 555 MW in May 2026. That was a contract with a customer, not the capacity of a building. It is not in the Eastern Creek row.
A group pipeline target is not a facility. If an operator says it is "developing 2 GW", that number belongs to the company's investor deck, not to any address.
An energy supply agreement is not an IT load. A signed power purchase agreement tells you what a developer hopes to draw one day, not what a hall is provisioned for now.
A campus total is never summed with its own buildings. The single most common way published Australian pipeline numbers get inflated.

Every row carries the URL it came from and the date it was read. When an operator changes a page, the old figure and the new one both stay, with their dates. See the methodology. Found something wrong? Tell us, and please do not be polite about it.

Why this matters to a business

Two practical uses.

If you need Australian data residency, the filter above shows which facilities are certified for government data and which operators say so on their own site. That is a shorter list than the marketing suggests, and "hosted in Australia" in a vendor's brochure is not the same as a certified facility.

If you are budgeting for AI, the electricity story is what sits underneath every price you pay. Model prices are on the comparison page, and the calculator turns your own volumes into a monthly figure.